Politics

Jeffries Says He Plans To ‘Hurt’ People

[Gage Skidmore from Surprise, AZ, United States of America, CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons]

With airport lines stretching for hours and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) workers going unpaid, the Trump administration is moving to deploy Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to U.S. airports—a decision that has triggered unhinged comments from House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and exposed the deeper political calculus behind the ongoing Department of Homeland Security (DHS) shutdown.

Appearing Sunday on CNN’s State of the Union, Jeffries cautioned that inserting ICE personnel into crowded airport environments could escalate routine encounters into dangerous confrontations. “We’ve already seen how ICE conducts itself,” Jeffries said. “These are untrained individuals when it comes to doing the current job that they have, for the most part, let alone deploying them in close exposure in highly sensitive situations at airports across the country.” He warned the move could result in “chaos,” “brutality,” and potentially loss of life.

The deployment—confirmed by White House border czar Tom Homan—is expected to begin as early as Monday, with ICE agents assisting overwhelmed TSA operations amid the partial shutdown, now entering its second month. Administration officials say the agents will focus on crowd control and immigration enforcement support, not primary screening duties, as backlogs mount during peak spring travel.

President Donald Trump has framed the move as both a practical response to the crisis and a broader assertion of immigration enforcement authority. In recent Truth Social posts, he pledged to send “brilliant and patriotic ICE Agents to the Airports” to restore order if Democrats continue to withhold DHS funding. He added that agents would carry out security functions “like no one has ever seen before,” including the arrest of individuals in the country illegally.

But the airport disruption itself is inseparable from the political standoff that caused it. The plan from Democrats, in their own words, is to “make people hurt,” reported Axios, in an effort to relitigate spending for immigration enforcement in place through 2029.

Recent remarks from Sen. Peter Welch, a Democrat from Vermont, have revealed what the real endgame is for Democras. Speaking on C-SPAN, Welch suggested that funding the Department of Homeland Security while excluding immigration enforcement agencies could create leverage for a long-stalled immigration liberal goals of amnesty. Separating ICE from the broader appropriations package, he said, “may allow us, then, to have… a discussion that’s overdue” on “a reasonable immigration plan and a reasonable way to deal with some folks who don’t have legal status.”

That’s right. Democrats are causing massive lines at the airport in support of open borders amnesty and are pretending it’s Donald Trump’s fault.

Legal analyst Jonathan Turley pointed to Welch’s remarks as part of a wider pattern, citing similar statements from Democratic lawmakers that center resistance to ICE funding as the core issue in the standoff. In Turley’s assessment, the approach reflects a calculated effort to isolate immigration enforcement within budget negotiations while permitting dysfunction to accumulate elsewhere in the system, thereby increasing political pressure.

The consequences are already visible on the ground. TSA staffing shortages have deepened as missed paychecks take their toll, with some officers reportedly leaving their posts. At major airports across the country, travelers are encountering longer lines, cascading delays, and growing operational strain—symptoms of a system under sustained fiscal uncertainty.

[Read More: AOC Questioned About Campaign Funds For Drugs]

You may also like

More in:Politics

Comments are closed.