News

Prosecutor Who Offered Tesla Vandal Diversion Hits O’Keefe and Higby With Felonies

[Pilottap, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons]

Democrats have finally found a case of voter fraud they think should be prosecuted. The Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty, whose office offered diversion to a leftwing Minnesota state employee accused of vandalizing six Teslas last year, announced Wednesday that conservative activists James O’Keefe and Cam Higby face unlawful voting and identity theft charges over an undercover election operation. Neither man cast a ballot.

The charges stem from visits to Minneapolis-area polling places during Minnesota’s August 11 primary. Prosecutors allege the men gave election judges the names of registered voters without their permission while recording encounters intended to test the state’s election procedures. They wore Muslim-style clothing, used accents and left without signing the required oath or voting. They recorded what they did to show how Minnesota does not validate legal votes and to show that ballot boxes could easily be stuffed with fake voters.

Moriarty argues that the alleged crime occurred before a ballot could be cast. Minnesota’s law prohibits intentionally misrepresenting one’s identity while applying for a ballot, and her office maintains that the men crossed that threshold.

“I think it’s pretty clear they did not intend to vote. That’s not the question here,” Moriarty said. She maintains that the prosecution concerns their conduct, not their political views.

Higby rejected that explanation, calling the prosecution “lawfare” and denying wrongdoing. O’Keefe’s organization has described the operation as an investigation into Minnesota’s vouching system, which allows a registered voter to affirm another person’s residence for same-day registration. Election officials contend that workers followed the rules and that the videos did not establish the vulnerabilities the activists claimed.

The contrast with Moriarty’s earlier exercise of prosecutorial discretion is difficult to miss.

In April 2025, her office offered pre-charge diversion to Dylan Bryan Adams, a state employee accused of causing more than $20,000 in damage to six Teslas. Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara publicly criticized the decision after investigators assembled the case.

Moriarty’s office defended diversion as a way to obtain restitution, preserve Adams’ employment and reduce repeat offenses. It said criminal prosecution remained possible if he failed to meet the program’s requirements. Those are meaningful conditions, but they also demonstrate how much flexibility the office possesses when deciding whether alleged misconduct warrants felony prosecution.

It’s not the first time that her office has been lenient for political reasons:

Whether O’Keefe and Higby violated Minnesota law will turn on the evidence and the statute’s requirements, but there’s little doubt that Moriarty would be prosecuting them if they weren’t liberal journalists showing how easily it is to cast fraudulent votes in Minnesota. Their initial court appearance is scheduled for November 16; Moriarty has indicated that probation would likely be the presumptive outcome if they are convicted.

[READ MORE: Liberal Activist Defaces 9-11 Memorial]

You may also like

More in:News

Comments are closed.